The wrong tool
Lovable, Cursor, Claude Code or Codex are not for the same moment. The wrong choice shows up in the code.
I bring a developer's judgment. Build With Me: I train you, then you continue on your own. Done For You: I take care of everything. I validate and I supervise.
Moving fast with AI does not remove your responsibility. The wrong tool, code you can no longer hold, a payment or data set up badly: a published application commits your customers, their money and your name.
Lovable, Cursor, Claude Code or Codex are not for the same moment. The wrong choice shows up in the code.
The application moves forward, but you can no longer explain what it does or change it without breaking everything.
A payment collected without a reliable order, a refund or a record.
Accounts, documents, history: once live, "I don't know who can access this" does not hold.
The project becomes too heavy. That is the moment to be trained, or to let me take care of everything.
Start with Build With Me: you build, I guide. A full build stays available later, if you choose it.
Who it is for
You are building with Lovable, Cursor, Claude Code or Bolt, and you want to stay in charge.
What you get
I teach you how to get the most out of your tools, until you can work on your own. I stay on as a supervisor: the aim is that you no longer need me, except when you run into a problem.
What makes it distinct
You keep the speed of AI. I bring a developer's judgment, for much less than a full-time hire. AI executes. It does not understand the risks.
Who it is for
You do not want to build it yourself. You want to hand over the project, from the need through to launch.
What you get
I take care of everything: the product, the code, the tools and the release. You do not have to run the IDE or decide the architecture.
What makes it distinct
You hand it over, and I carry the project through. Even if AI already wrote part of it, you do not have to take it back alone.
I am a Software Engineer in Marseille. I master both the code and the AI tools: which one to use, how to set it up, and when not to trust it. CDA diploma, IBM certifications in agentic AI.
IDE, Cursor, Claude Code, Codex: I use them to build, and I show you which to choose for the project.
The tool speeds things up. I judge the architecture, the data, the payments and what will break later.
Applications people use every day, from the interface to accounts, data and Stripe. Not demonstrations.
I challenge what the tool proposes. Nothing reaches production without a human review.
Glucose-monitoring SaaS in production: authentication, reports and an AI assistant grounded in user history. Hundreds of people use it every day.
View the projectBusiness commerce platform with catalog, orders, quotes, user accounts and Stripe payments.
View the projectFull rebuild and technical SEO. The business now ranks at the top of local results for its target query in La Seyne-sur-Mer, without paid ads.
View the projectYes. The conversation is meant for a founder building with AI who needs technical judgment in plain language.
Yes. Your tools stay yours. My role is to check what they produce and the decisions they suggest.
Yes. The diagnosis shows what can stay and what needs to be reworked before going further.
Yes, if you want to. Guidance does not force you to delegate, and handing over the build does not discard the work already done.
Bring the state of the project, the tools you use and what worries you. We will see whether to guide, take over or build.
Book a conversation ↗